Why Zorya costs once, and never again

Somewhere along the way, nearly every app decided that a one time purchase was not enough, that the only sustainable business was a subscription renewing quietly in the background for as long as it could go unnoticed by the person paying it. We decided the opposite, on purpose, from the very first version of Zorya, before the app had a single user to test that decision against.

The subscription model makes obvious sense from a business perspective, and we understand exactly why most companies choose it. Recurring revenue is predictable, investors tend to favor it, and it turns every user into an ongoing source of income rather than a single transaction that ends the relationship. None of that is inherently dishonest on its own. But it does create a particular incentive that shapes how an app behaves toward you long after you have already decided you like it: the app now needs you to keep paying, month after month, for something you may only need intensely for a specific, limited stretch of your life.

A pregnancy does not last forever, and neither should the bill

Pregnancy is around forty weeks, give or take. After that, the app you used to track contractions and log symptoms is either no longer needed at all, or needed in a completely different way if you move on to tracking a newborn or a postpartum stage instead. A subscription model sits a little awkwardly against that reality, because it depends on you either continuing to pay for something you have mostly finished using, or remembering to cancel it at exactly the right moment amid the chaos of the first weeks with a newborn, which is, gently put, not the moment anyone has the bandwidth to manage a subscription cancellation properly.

We wanted the business model to match the actual shape of the need it was serving. You pay once, you get the app for the length of your pregnancy and well beyond it, and nothing renews quietly while your attention is somewhere else entirely, like it usually is during those first weeks with a new baby in the house.

What it means for how we build

A one time purchase also changes our own incentives in a way we think about often, more than people might expect. We do not need you to open the app every day to justify a monthly charge, so we never built streaks, badges, or notification prompts trying to manufacture that habit artificially. We are not selling your attention to advertisers to cover a free tier, so there was never a reason to build any of the tracking infrastructure that model usually requires behind the scenes. The entire relationship stays simple: you paid us once, directly, for a tool that does what it says, and that is the whole transaction from start to finish.

It also means we have to build something genuinely worth that one payment up front, rather than something worth trying for free and tolerating indefinitely because canceling feels like too much effort to bother with. That is a harder bar to clear in some ways than it might sound. There is no drip feed of monthly revenue smoothing over a feature that does not quite work yet. It has to be right closer to launch, or people simply would not have paid for it in the first place, and we would hear about it quickly.

The trade we are comfortable making

This approach will probably always make Zorya a smaller business than it could be as a subscription, and we have made peace with that outcome. We are fine with that trade in the long run. We would rather build something a person pays for once, uses fully, and eventually stops needing, than something that quietly keeps charging long after it stopped being useful to them in any real sense. A pregnancy app, more than almost any other kind of app, should have a natural ending built into its own business model, the same way the pregnancy itself does.

We get asked sometimes whether we worry about the long term sustainability of pricing this way, and the honest answer is that we think about it constantly, the way any small business owner thinks about the numbers behind the thing they built. But we would rather run a smaller, steadier studio built on that kind of straightforward trust than a larger one built on a billing cycle people forget they are still paying into. If that means Zorya grows more slowly than it otherwise might have under a different pricing model entirely, that is a trade we made with open eyes from the very beginning, and honestly, one we would happily make again without much hesitation at all.

Matea Raić avatar

Posted by

Odgovori